Avon Chambers monogramAvon Chambers
HomeAboutPractice AreasLawyersLife at Avon
  • News & Events
  • Articles
  • Pro Bono
  • Careers
  • Contact
Book a Consultation

Avon Chambers

A Bangladesh-based set of law chambers providing professional legal advice and representation to corporate and private clients.

Flat 4A, Level 3, Kanak Bindu, House 39A, Road No. 8
Dhanmondi, Dhaka 1205

Quick links

  • Home
  • About
  • Practice Areas
  • Lawyers
  • Life at Avon
  • News & Events
  • Articles
  • Pro Bono
  • Careers
  • Contact

Contact

  • (88) 01841010059
  • info@avonchambers.com
  • Sat–Thurs, 9:30am – 6:30pm

Legal

  • Terms of Engagement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Lawyer Advertising
  • Accessibility
  • All Policies

© 2026 Avon Chambers. All rights reserved.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

High Court Protects Investor’s 60% Stake in a Brokerage House, Orders Status Quo

News

High Court Protects Investor’s 60% Stake in a Brokerage House, Orders Status Quo

All news & events
October 8, 2026

The Company Bench in the High Court Division admitted a company dispute filed by an investor to officially recognize his majority ownership in a private limited company in Bangladesh, by rectification of share register and ordered status quo regarding shareholding position.

What Happened?

Back in 2021, the original founders of a private limited company needed BDT 4.00 Crore to pay the required registration fee and security deposit to the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) for a brokerage (TREC) license. Unable to raise the money themselves, they approached the investor for investment.

In good faith, he agreed to fund the full BDT 4.00 Crore directly to the DSE in exchange for 3,00,000 shares giving him a 60% controlling stake in the company. The founders signed the necessary share transfer documents (Form 117s) and handed them over.

The Dispute:

Despite receiving the full funding and signing the transfer forms, the original founders never officially registered the investor’s name as a shareholder with the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and Firms (RJSC).

Over the next few years, the company fell into severe management delays, failing to submit required government filings and leading to the suspension of its brokerage license by the DSE. When the investor stepped in to clean up the regulatory backlog and protect his BDT 3.00 Crore security deposit, the original founders turned on him denying that any share transfer had ever taken place and filing criminal charges against him.

The High Court’s Action:

With his name wrongfully left off the official list of owners, the owner petitioned the High Court Division under Section 43 of the Companies Act, 1994, which allows the court to correct official company ownership records.

After hearing the arguments of the lawyer on behalf of the petitioner, the High Court formally accepted the lawsuit for trial and issued a status quo order. This legal freeze ensures that the founders cannot sell, alter, or dilute any shares in the private limited company while the court determines the final ownership.

Managing Partner Asif Bin Anwar of Avon Chambers and Senior Associate Kristi Keya Saha handled the matter on behalf of the investor.

Keep reading

More from Chambers

News
October 11, 2026

Avon Chambers Acts Against Online Defamation and Privacy Threats

Avon Chambers served a legal notice over Facebook Live defamation, threats to leak private salon CCTV footage, and an AI-altered photograph published without consent, demanding content removal, permanent deletion, a public apology and compensation.

Read more
News
October 11, 2026

Bangladesh Tax and Employee Benefits | Avon Chambers

Avon Chambers advised an international not-for-profit organisation on key tax and employment matters affecting its Bangladesh operations.

Read more
News
October 4, 2026

High Court Rejects Habeas Corpus Shortcut in Child Custody Dispute: Family Court Appeal Cannot Be Bypassed

A recent High Court Division decision reinforces an important procedural rule in family disputes: where custody and visitation are already before the Family Court, a parent dissatisfied with an order should use the statutory appeal route rather than recast the dispute as unlawful detention through habeas corpus.

Read more

Book a consultation

Tell us what happened. We'll tell you where you stand.

Initial consultations are 45 minutes and held with the partner who would lead your matter.

Direct line
(88) 01841010059
Office
Flat 4A, Level 3, Kanak Bindu, House 39A, Road No. 8
Dhanmondi, Dhaka 1205
Confidentiality
Everything you send is treated as privileged and confidential, whether or not we go on to represent you.

Get in touch

The fastest way to reach us — message the team directly on WhatsApp and we’ll respond as soon as we can.

Contact us on WhatsApp

Follow us